Powder examples
Watch example tests and see the results of samples similar to your own.
See how samples similar to yours behave
Powders don’t behave the same way from one product to the next – a free-flowing drink mix, a cohesive cosmetic pigment, a fine pharmaceutical API, or a mineral blend can each present very different challenges in handling, processing, and performance. This page brings together real-world powder testing examples across a wide range of sample types and industries, showing how targeted measurements translate into meaningful results – from flowability to caking, whether its desirable or unwanted depending upon your application. Explore the tests, see typical outputs and comparisons with similar samples in their field, and discover how powder data can help you improve consistency, troubleshoot process issues, and specify materials with confidence.
How to read these results
Each entry shows videos and data from 3 tests run on the same sample – a Cohesion test, Caking test and PFSD test (video not shown) – alongside a characterisation summary and a note on typical real-world behaviour.
What the test data column shows
Cohesion Index (CI) – measures how hard it is to get the powder moving. Higher values indicate greater resistance to flow initiation. As a rough guide: below 10 is low cohesion, 10-25 is moderate, 25-40 is high, above 40 is very high.
Bridging Factor – indicates whether the powder tends to form stable structures that block an outlet. A low Bridging Factor means resistance is mainly frictional; a high value suggests the powder is prone to arching or ratholing regardless of how sticky it is. Some granular materials with low cohesion have very high Bridging Factors – this is why cohesion alone doesn't tell the full story.
Speed Ratio – shows whether flow resistance changes as handling speed increases or decreases. A value close to 1 means behaviour is consistent across speeds. Values significantly above or below 1 indicate the powder is sensitive to process rate – important for conveying, dosing, and filling operations.
Flow Stability – captures whether behaviour changes with repeated handling. A value of 1 means consistent behaviour test after test. Values above 1 indicate the powder is hardening or compacting during handling; values below 1 indicate it is breaking down or loosening. Either direction of drift can cause dosing or filling inconsistency over a production run.
Mean Cake Strength and Cake Strength – from the Caking test, these describe how hard the formed cake is locally (Mean Cake Strength) and how much total work is required to break the whole cake (Cake Strength). Higher values indicate a harder, more resistant cake – relevant to storage stability, restart difficulty, and the likelihood of lumps or set product after transport.
Column Height Ratio and Cake Height Ratio – also from the Caking test. Column Height Ratio shows how much the overall powder bed settles and consolidates; a value below 1 means the bed has compressed under cycling. Cake Height Ratio shows what proportion of the bed has become cake – a value close to 0 means very little cake formed; close to 1 means almost the entire sample has set.
What the characterisation summary shows
This is an interpreted overview of the combined test profile – identifying which parameters are most significant for that powder and flagging the primary risk in practical handling terms, such as bridging tendency, caking after storage, or speed-dependent variability.
What the typical behaviour column shows
A brief contextual note placing the results in the context of how this type of powder typically behaves in industry – helping you assess whether the results are expected for this material type or whether something specific to the sample is driving the numbers.
A note on these values
All data shown was obtained from testing in glass vessels under standard laboratory conditions. Results reflect the specific sample tested and should be used as indicative benchmarks rather than definitive specifications – your own powder may vary depending on particle size distribution, moisture content, processing history, and storage conditions.
How the Primary Risk Flag is decided
Based on the values obtained from each sample, the most likely process failure risk has been identified. The primary risk label is drawn from the following categories:
- Geometry-driven arching - low or moderate CI with a high Bridging Factor; discharge failure is driven by particle interlocking and outlet geometry rather than stickiness
- Severe arching/hard-set formation - extreme Bridging Factor combined with high cake strength; risk of complete blockage and difficult restart after storage or dwell
- Storage consolidation/caking - high cake strength and/or strong column compression; powder sets under load and resists restart
- Throughput instability - Flow Stability outside the stable band (above ~1.2 or below ~0.9); behaviour changes during repeated handling, causing dosing or filling inconsistency
- Speed-related variability - Speed Ratio significantly above or below 1; flow behaviour changes with conveying or feed rate, causing over- or under-fill
- Bridging combined with consolidation - high CI alongside a high Bridging Factor and significant cake strength; multiple mechanisms combine to create discharge and restart risk
- Conditioning and cycling instability - drift in flow behaviour across repeated test cycles; indicates sensitivity to handling history rather than a single dominant mechanism
If multiple risks exist, the one most likely to dominate real process failure has been chosen.
Food ingredients and blends
Baking powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 14.21 |
|
|
Carrageenan
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.22 |
|
|
Caster sugar
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.21 |
|
|
Coarse sea salt
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 6.91 |
|
|
Coffee granules
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.83 |
|
|
Coffee powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.00 |
|
|
Coffee whitener
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 13.41 |
|
|
Cornflour
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 20.16 |
|
|
Couscous
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.51 |
|
|
Demerara sugar
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.11 |
|
|
Drinking chocolate
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 13.84 |
|
|
Flaked rice
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.37 |
|
|
Garam masala
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 18.55 |
|
|
Gellan gum
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.55 |
|
|
Granular sweetener
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.09 |
|
|
Granulated sugar
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.02 |
|
|
Ground almonds
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 18.32 |
|
|
Icing sugar
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 14.88 |
|
|
Light brown soft sugar
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 7.03 |
|
|
Linseed
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.26 |
|
|
Loose tea
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.60 |
|
|
Malt drinking powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 16.15 |
|
|
Oatbran
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.90 |
|
|
Polenta
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.36 |
|
|
Protein powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 24.95 |
|
|
Red lentils
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.54 |
|
|
Sea salt flakes
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.34 |
|
|
Sesame seed
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.47 |
|
|
Slimming powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.40 |
|
|
Soy protein
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.53 |
|
|
Table salt
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.57 |
|
|
Tapioca
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 7.52 |
|
|
Thickening granules
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.70 |
|
|
Wheatbran
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.37 |
|
|
White flour
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 13.86 |
|
|
Wholemeal flour
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 20.73 |
|
|
Xanthan – Locust bean gum blend
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.04 |
|
|
Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical powders
Baby formula
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.77 |
|
|
Ethylcellulose
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 28.15 |
|
|
Gellan gum
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.55 |
|
|
Influenza medication
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.33 |
|
|
Protein powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 24.95 |
|
|
Slimming powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.40 |
|
|
Cosmetics and personal care powders
Baby powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 16.67 |
|
|
Bath salts
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.86 |
|
|
Denture cleanser
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 8.59 |
|
|
Face powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 41.04 |
|
|
Foot powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 15.93 |
|
|
Washing powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.47 |
|
|
Agriculture, animal feed and horticulture
Bird sand
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 7.90 |
|
|
Grass seed
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.54 |
|
|
Insect food
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.98 |
|
|
Nyjer seed
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.84 |
|
|
Sawdust
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 12.32 |
|
|
Industrial and speciality powders
Carpet freshener
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.96 |
|
|
Cement
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 13.77 |
|
|
Interior filler
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.10 |
|
|
Plaster
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 15.28 |
|
|
Scouring powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 15.87 |
|
|
Soda crystals
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.48 |
|
|
Stain removing powder
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 11.08 |
|
|
Sugar soap
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.72 |
|
|
Tile grout
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 10.13 |
|
|
Wallpaper adhesive
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 7.40 |
|
|
Water softener
| Test data |
Characterisation summary |
Typical behaviour vs results |
|
Cohesion Index: 9.27 |
|
|
Note: Data shown above obtained from testing in glass vessels.